2019 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)

How to Subscribe
MLS & MLT Comprehensive CE Package
Includes 178 CE courses, most popular
$109Add to cart
Pick Your Courses
Up to 8 CE hours
$55Add to cart
Individual course$25Add to cart
Need multiple seats for your university or lab? Get a quote
The page below is a sample from the LabCE course Molecular Methods in Clinical Microbiology (A Historical Review). Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about Molecular Methods in Clinical Microbiology (A Historical Review) (online CE course)
2019 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)

In December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in patient cases originating in Wuhan, China. The contagious disease rapidly spread worldwide, leading to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, many molecular assay developers scrambled to add a sensitive and specific COVID-19 test to existing platforms. Several systems were authorized under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approval status.
For obvious reasons (eg., proper treatment and isolation precautions), it became imperative for hospital ICUs and Emergency Departments to distinguish between FLU and COVID respiratory infections as quickly as possible.
As mentioned, several molecular PCR platforms and assay developments occurred in rapid succession and included the use of platforms validated for nasal/ nasopharyngeal swabs or nasal wash/ aspirate samples. Two targets, E and N2 are frequently used. Recently, some well-known manufacturers added Flu A, Flu B, and RSV to the SARS-CoV-2 -- four tests (multiplex) in a single test process. (NOTE: 2009 H1N1 is no longer reported out separately from most platform results, as this flu has become part of seasonally circulating FluA.)
Several popular rapid testing molecular platforms now detect nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2. Respiratory swab specimens are usually utilized. As an alternative, panels have now been developed. Several multiplex panels available on well-known platforms now perform rapid screens simultaneously for as many as 22 viral and bacterial pathogens causing respiratory infections (including SARS-CoV-2). Although costly, many of these rapid tests save time in diagnosing patients and are easy to use - eliminating the need to send specimens to referral laboratories for extensive viral workup.
NOTE: Several other vendors (too numerous to cover in the scope of this course) are geared toward rapid testing in the clinical microbiology laboratory and have been approved by FDA, or are under development. These vendors use the primers and probes that have been recommended by the CDC to detect SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR.
8. CDC/Gathany. Image #23897."This Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist was preparing to test a patient’s sample for SARS-CoV-2, using the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase (RT)–PCR Diagnostic Panel." PHIL public domain, 2020. Accessed May 31, 2022. https://phil.cdc.gov//PHIL_Images/23897/23897_lores.jpg
9. CDC/Gathany. Image #24483."This Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist was positioning samples, prepared for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This diagnostic technique is the "gold standard" for SARS-CoV-2 testing." PHIL public domain, 2020. Accessed May 31, 2022. https://phil.cdc.gov//PHIL_Images/24483/24483_lores.jpg

Pipetting of sample for PCR. (8)
Prepping analyzer for RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing. (9)