3. Do the results of the initial antibody screen (shown below) support the presence of the identified antibody?
Cell | Rh-Hr | Kell | Duffy | Kidd | Lewis | Lutheran | P | MNSs | Xg |
|
| Rh | D | C | c | E | e | Cw | K | k | Kpa | Jsa | Fya | Fyb | Jka | Jkb | Lea | Leb | Lua | Lub | P | M | N | S | s | Xga | Gel IAT |
1 | R2R2 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 3+ |
2 | R1R1 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 2+ |
3 | rr | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 2+ |
No: All 3 screen cells reacted in the initial screen. Upon review, however, only Screen Cells 1 and 3 were Jk(a+); Screen Cell 2 reacted but was Jk(a-).
A reference laboratory investigated this anomalous result. It was discovered that the patient had anti-Rd, an antibody to the low-frequency antigen radin (Rd). By chance, Screen Cell 2 was Rd-positive. Radin has a frequency of less than 0.5% in several populations tested.
If the screen cell manufacturer were notified, they would likely confirm that the cell was Rd-positive, inform their clients, and document it in future antigrams.