Postexamination Considerations

How to Subscribe
MLS & MLT Comprehensive CE Package
Includes 176 CE courses, most popular
$109Add to cart
Pick Your Courses
Up to 8 CE hours
$55Add to cart
Individual course$25Add to cart
Need multiple seats for your university or lab? Get a quote
The page below is a sample from the LabCE course Microbial Identification Using MALDI-TOF MS. Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about Microbial Identification Using MALDI-TOF MS (online CE course)
Postexamination Considerations

No identification system is without problems and the same is true with MALDI-TOF MS. A few of the most common issues include the inability to separate certain microorganisms (based on profile similarity), the absence of microorganisms from the database, and the identification of an apparently unusual microorganism that is closely related to a commonly known microorganism (e.g., Enterobacter absuriae, a member of the Enterobacter cloacae complex). It is of significant note that erroneous identifications are extremely rare, but caution needs to be exercised and correlation with growth requirements (rate of growth, atmosphere of growth), colony morphology, and Gram stain are strongly recommended.
One common example of the inability to separate certain organisms involves Shigella species and Escherichia coli, which are so closely related that Shigella is not identified by MALDI-TOF MS. To differentiate, colonies should be examined for lactose fermentation, motility, and spot indole should be performed. If positive, an identification of E. coli is appropriate, especially for non-stool specimens. If negative for these tests and particularly for stool isolates, Shigella should be suspected, and an alternative method for identification like a phenotypic or immunologic (agglutination) assay performed.
Additionally, differentiating among species within the Streptococcus mitis group is poor. It is particularly important to identify these alpha-hemolytic streptococci correctly as S. mitis/oralis frequently represents non-pathogenic colonization, but S. pneumoniae is a pathogen capable of causing serious and life-threatening disease.22,23 MALDI-TOF MS can now discriminate S. pneumoniae from non-pneumococcal streptococci within the mitis group, with misidentification occurring less than 1% of the time.24 Some laboratories have implemented the practice of confirming a positive Streptococcus pneumoniae identification by MALDI-TOF MS with an Optochin disk susceptibility.
The ability to definitively identify organisms to genus and species that are unfamiliar to clinicians and laboratorians alike poses a particular problem. Users of the Bruker system have encountered a number of these, and some have chosen to lump these into a “group” or “complex” of microorganisms with a reporting designation familiar to practitioners. Additionally, reporting by genus designation may also be of more significance than giving a species designation that has no additional clinical impact. Some examples of these are listed in the table.
Species/Group/ComplexStrains Included in Database
Citrobacter freundii complexC. braakii, C. freundii, C. gillenii, C. murliniae, C. rodentium, C. sedlakii, C. werkmannii, C. youngae
Enterobacter cloacae complexE. asburiae, E. cancerogenus, E. cloacae, E. hormaechei, E. kobei, E. ludwigii
Klebsiella pneumoniae complexK. pneumoniae, K. granulomatis, K. singaporensis, K. variicola
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia S. maltophilia, Pseudomonas beteli, Ps. hibiscola, Ps. geniculata
A description of microorganisms can be found in a number of online databases, including:
22. Manji R, Bythrow M, Branda JA, Burnham CA, Ferraro MJ, Garner OB, Jennemann R, Lewinski MA, Mochon AB, Procop GW, Richter SS, Rychert JA, Sercia L, Westblade LF, Ginocchio CC. "Multi-center evaluation of the VITEK® MS system for mass spectrometric identification of non-Enterobacteriaceae Gram-negative bacilli." Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(3):337-346. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24019163/.
23. Chen JHK, She KKK, Wong OY, Teng JLL, Yam WC, Lau SKP, Woo PC, Cheng VCC, Yuen KY. "Use of MALDI Biotyper plus ClinProTools mass spectra analysis for correct identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus mitis/oralis." J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(8):652-656. Available at: http://jcp.bmj.com/content/68/8/652.
24. Rychert, Jenna. "Benefits and Limitations of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Identification of Microorganisms." Journal of Infectiology & Epidemiology, 2 Jul 2019, DOI: 10.29245/2689-9981/2019/4.1142.